Tuesday, September 26, 2023
Lysine and (+) Catechin disable melanoma cells from establishing metastases
Thursday, September 14, 2023
Is there any evidence whatsoever that dietary L-Lysine is helpful against atherosclerosis? Yes, but
It was not until 2014, until a group in Japan studied a kidney disease related calcification disorder of the arteries. It wouldn't be scientific to conflate this discovery to any other etiologies or use this for a cross claim where there was no evidence, although it recommends that L-Lysine be studied in atherosclerosis arrived through various pathologies. A novel MOA, not considered before is the suppression of iPTH. Very profound. Importantly, they do not claim it reverts pre-existing calcification, and that this is an open question.
The General Electric Lysine-Sepharose column for Lipoprotein(a) purification relies on the lysine binding sites (LBS) of apo(a) to capture it before eluting it with stronger affinity lysine analogs. The study was never done in rodents to see if lysine could dislodge Lp(a) deposits in atherosclerotic plaque. There certainly was ample time and resources available to do so and it remains an open question.
Dietary l-Lysine Prevents Arterial Calcification in Adenine-Induced Uremic Rats
Wednesday, August 23, 2023
Vitamin C and Cancer - The Research Isn't Finished.
New evidence shows very different mechanisms of action than that expounded about, such as pro-oxidant and antioxidant effects, pro-drug effects, immune side effects, tumor side effects, stromal effects, epithelial to mesenchyme transition effects, and useful fibrosis. The last mechanism, reliant on dense collagen meshes from the "schirrous response" or foreign body response is the same an oyster does to a grain of sand, except instead of pearl, the human body uses collagen. Sometimes, the tumor turns into a fibrous, benign cyst. Other times, the stroma prevents TIL from approaching it. Certainly, when a tumor is free to break away from the primary, it makes for more metastases, which is what makes cancer so lethal. No doubt the capsule buys more time, even with a very vascularized tumor. Pauling noted a new compound made, between ascorbic acid and the cements between cells that inhibits hyaluronidase, which dissolves the cement and allows tumor cells to spread. This enzymatic inhibitor was called a physiological hyaluronidase inhibitor, PHI.
"It now seems clear that the active component of PHI is a tetrasaccharide with a terminal glucuronic acid unit replaced by an ascorbate residue, resistant to exoglycosidase activity, and therefore capable of blocking the whole process of glycosaminoglycan depolymerization." Cameron, et. al 1979
There was no compelling body of work since then to prove or disprove the in situ generation of such a PHI around tumors that required vitamin C to be made. As in zero papers since then.
In 2023, epigenetic reprogramming, a reset mechanism, was discovered. This isn't ammunition for the loony bin and death bed burglars of Linus Pauling to scream in vindication. Hardly so, for this discovery isn't theirs and they claimed all sorts of outlandish buffoon thoughts.
Vitamin C boosts DNA demethylation in TET2 germline mutation carriers
Tuesday, June 20, 2023
Copper Deficiency Can Cause Heart Failure
Here is some good science out of the British Medical Journal that will spare a lot of good people from a lot of bad grief, mysteriously caused by a simple lack of dietary copper.
Copper deficiency may be a leading cause of ischaemic heart disease
Saturday, December 24, 2022
Ethics in Medicine
Saturday, March 26, 2022
Setting Matthias Rath's erroneous claim to Vitamin C Therapy for Atherosclerosis straight for the record for history beyond 2022
When Matthias Rath sued Linus Pauling for his alleged original discoveries in the 90's, The Court Law in the USA dictated that whoever was first to discover the application was the legally entitled bearer to patent protection.
At the time Matthias Rath sued Linus Pauling, the first to discover vitamin C as a way to prevent occlusive arterial diseases, atherosclerosis, so on an so forth was neither Linus Pauling or Matthias Rath, but Constance R Spittle.
The automatic legal machinery then, now, and today would negate and reverse all and every of Matthias Rath's purported legitimacy as holding this intellectual property. How this ruling was made at all points to a complete ignorance in the history of this body of discovery by The Court, probably through sheer ignorance, as the "internet" and "cloud" were not availed to The Court until after these errors. As of 2022, we can see that all and every of Matthias Rath's claims against Linus Pauling were and are invalid as by global law.
The Ultimate form of "Gaslighting" by Putin:
Attempting to override any sense of logic by means of hypnosis and trickery, Putin offers dozens of excuses of why he pre-emptively invaded Ukraine without any threat to Russia from Ukraine or NATO.
In fact, President Biden had willingly offered to support Nord Stream 2, which by default meant NATO protection of Moscow petroleum assets.
Through Putin's crazed, irrational actions, thoughts, and behaviors, this is no longer possible for Russia, and only Putin is to blame for this insanity.
Facts:
1) Ukraine was never a member of NATO.
2) Had Ukraine joined NATO, there would still be zero threat to Putin, but actually, increased security of its oil assets (Nord Stream 2) enriching Moscow and feeding Europe. NATO, unlike Putin, has zero land grab motivations in Ukraine or continental Russia. Putin has lost his mind.
3) Putin invaded Ukraine. NATO did not invade Ukraine or even wish to. NATO never wishes to invade Russia or Ukraine.
What the world must realize is that there are suicidal groups who wish to goad on a WW3. Neither Biden, NATO, Z, or anyone else in the governance of Europe, USA, Ukraine, and probably Moscow want a world ending WW3, and this is what it will be. Even those innocent nations who are not involved will be poisoned beyond the ability to sustain anything but the most primitive radiation resistant life forms. Even radiation resistant humans will perish forever. No humans will survive WW3, and as history will see it, it will have been the most stupid, shameful failure, proving our delusion in the belief of ourselves as better than a monkey with a nuke in its hand false.
Obviously, the worst thing for global human health is WW3. Nothing could come close to the decimation that will follow, even indirectly, by WW3. The suffering will eclipse WW2 unimaginably. As a global health aim, stopping WW3 is currently our first priority.