www.newstarget.com versus organicjar.com
Truth be told, no one wants to listen to adults fight for online dominance like kindergartners. Especially when the information pertains to how people can keep themselves healthy without drugs or going under the knife. This is no small thing either, as everything in life is hunky dory until you need these things and then you see how costly sickness is in terms of physical, emotional, mental, and financial resources. This is quite an atypical outburst.
Certainly, both sides have their point. As an online resource, both serve a noble public good. However, I have often found subtle to deep inaccuracies of some of the articles written by different authors on Newstarget. (Not to say that you won't ever find inaccuracies and irreproducible experiments in hard science journals.) The majority of them are very informative, accurate, and a split away from conventional pill-and-knife-after-the-fact-for-thousands-of-your-dollars-medicine. Even if Jason isn't making any money, he really should serve scientific literature conventions and give reference where reference is due.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Monday, January 12, 2009
The FDA writes Obama to correct internal corruption and decay
Why would we sit here and make up stuff like this?
"FDA Scientists Accuse Own Administration of Corruption, Intimidation and Scientific Censorship
by Mike Adams, NaturalNews Editor
(NaturalNews) FDA scientists have become so fed up with the criminal behavior of their own administration that they've filed a strongly-worded complaint with President-elect Obama, alleging the FDA has been deeply "corrupted and distorted."
FDA managers, the letter explains, are "placing the American people at risk" by using tactics of intimidation to censor scientific debate within the FDA. This scientific censorship agenda, of course, mirrors the exact same tactics used by the FDA outside the agency against makers of nutritional supplements or herbal products. Intimidation and censorship, it seems, are part of the very fabric of the FDA.
The letter explains that FDA managers "have ignored serious safety and effectiveness concerns of FDA experts." It then goes on to explain:
"Managers have ordered, intimidated and coerced FDA experts to modify scientific evaluations, conclusions and recommendations in violation of the laws, rules and regulations, and to accept clinical and technical data that is not scientifically valid."
In other words, the FDA is being run like a criminal mob operation with a complete disregard for actual science.
Fascinatingly, this letter shows that the FDA's own scientists agree with the NaturalNews view that the FDA is running a criminal racket, using the very same tactics relied on by organized crime!
The scientists also complain that FDA managers "committed the most outrageous misconduct by ordering, coercing and intimidating FDA physicians and scientists to recommend approval, and then retaliating when the physicians and scientists refused to go along."
This is the latest escalation in a war of words between FDA scientists and FDA managers. A previous incident occurred in November, 2008, when many of the same scientists sent a letter to members of Congress and the House Energy and Commerce Committee (http://www.naturalnews.com/024910.html). NaturalNews characterized the action as a "revolt" of FDA scientists.
That revolt has apparently escalated into something that might turn into outright mutiny."
Originally published January 12 2009
"FDA Scientists Accuse Own Administration of Corruption, Intimidation and Scientific Censorship
by Mike Adams, NaturalNews Editor
(NaturalNews) FDA scientists have become so fed up with the criminal behavior of their own administration that they've filed a strongly-worded complaint with President-elect Obama, alleging the FDA has been deeply "corrupted and distorted."
FDA managers, the letter explains, are "placing the American people at risk" by using tactics of intimidation to censor scientific debate within the FDA. This scientific censorship agenda, of course, mirrors the exact same tactics used by the FDA outside the agency against makers of nutritional supplements or herbal products. Intimidation and censorship, it seems, are part of the very fabric of the FDA.
The letter explains that FDA managers "have ignored serious safety and effectiveness concerns of FDA experts." It then goes on to explain:
"Managers have ordered, intimidated and coerced FDA experts to modify scientific evaluations, conclusions and recommendations in violation of the laws, rules and regulations, and to accept clinical and technical data that is not scientifically valid."
In other words, the FDA is being run like a criminal mob operation with a complete disregard for actual science.
Fascinatingly, this letter shows that the FDA's own scientists agree with the NaturalNews view that the FDA is running a criminal racket, using the very same tactics relied on by organized crime!
The scientists also complain that FDA managers "committed the most outrageous misconduct by ordering, coercing and intimidating FDA physicians and scientists to recommend approval, and then retaliating when the physicians and scientists refused to go along."
This is the latest escalation in a war of words between FDA scientists and FDA managers. A previous incident occurred in November, 2008, when many of the same scientists sent a letter to members of Congress and the House Energy and Commerce Committee (http://www.naturalnews.com/024910.html). NaturalNews characterized the action as a "revolt" of FDA scientists.
That revolt has apparently escalated into something that might turn into outright mutiny."
Originally published January 12 2009
Saturday, January 3, 2009
Pauling's "Physiological Hyaluronidase Inhibitor"
This was Linus Pauling's supposition: Ascorbic Acid and the Glycosaminoglycans: An Orthomolecular Approach to Cancer and Other Diseases. Be careful to note that he supposed that ascorbic acid may enhance the formation of a "PHI." Here is the paper.
It turns out that ascorbic acid IS a weak PHI on its own. However, it has never been thoroughly studied to date whether AA does upregulate a PHI, and what exactly this PHI is. There are dozens of basic questions about ascorbate biology that are still left unanswered.
In recent days, Yamamoto has focused on a hyaluronidase family enzyme, the N-acetylgalactosaminidase (NAGAlase) and its interference in changing Gc to GcMAF.
Today, there are brassica vegetable (yes, cabbage, broccoli, and brussel sprouts) originated ascorbic acid scaffold molecules that have been indentified as very potent (uM efficiency achievable by oral dosing) hyaluronidase inhibitors. Ascorbigen is one. While it may not actually be directly cytotoxic to cancer, it may behave in the way that Pauling had hypothesized decades ago.
Indole Derivative
L-Ascorbic Acid 6-Hexadecanoate, a Potent Hyaluronidase Inhibitor
It turns out that ascorbic acid IS a weak PHI on its own. However, it has never been thoroughly studied to date whether AA does upregulate a PHI, and what exactly this PHI is. There are dozens of basic questions about ascorbate biology that are still left unanswered.
In recent days, Yamamoto has focused on a hyaluronidase family enzyme, the N-acetylgalactosaminidase (NAGAlase) and its interference in changing Gc to GcMAF.
Today, there are brassica vegetable (yes, cabbage, broccoli, and brussel sprouts) originated ascorbic acid scaffold molecules that have been indentified as very potent (uM efficiency achievable by oral dosing) hyaluronidase inhibitors. Ascorbigen is one. While it may not actually be directly cytotoxic to cancer, it may behave in the way that Pauling had hypothesized decades ago.
Indole Derivative
L-Ascorbic Acid 6-Hexadecanoate, a Potent Hyaluronidase Inhibitor
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)